{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Law Right","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.law-right.com\/fr\/","author_name":"Christophe Boeraeve","author_url":"https:\/\/www.law-right.com\/fr\/author\/cboeraeve\/","title":"Le compromis de Rome | Law Right","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EzLiQyS1aZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law-right.com\/fr\/compromis-de-rome\/\">Le compromis de Rome<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.law-right.com\/fr\/compromis-de-rome\/embed\/#?secret=EzLiQyS1aZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00ab\u00a0Le compromis de Rome\u00a0\u00bb &#8212; Law Right\" data-secret=\"EzLiQyS1aZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.law-right.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Lors du processus de cr\u00e9ation de la Cour p\u00e9nale internationale, deux diff\u00e9rentes visions quant au mode de cr\u00e9ation de cette derni\u00e8re s\u2019affrontaient. D\u2019une part, certains Etats s\u2019appuyant sur le succ\u00e8s des tribunaux internationaux ad hoc, avaient esp\u00e9r\u00e9 avoir une juridiction permanente qui serait cr\u00e9\u00e9e sur base du Chapitre VII de la Charte des Nations Unies. Deux cons\u00e9quences \u00e0 ce mode de cr\u00e9ation peuvent \u00eatre not\u00e9es. D\u2019une part, dans la mesure o\u00f9 seul le Conseil de S\u00e9curit\u00e9 peut agir sur base du Chapitre VII de la Charte, l\u2019on sous-entend que la Cour permanente serait ainsi cr\u00e9\u00e9e par le Conseil de S\u00e9curit\u00e9 via l\u2019adoption d\u2019une R\u00e9solution. Ainsi, on aurait une Cour permanente qui ferait partie int\u00e9grante de l\u2019Organisation des Nations Unies. En d\u2019autre termes, l\u2019id\u00e9e \u00e9tait cr\u00e9er \u00ab\u00a0an international criminal court that fit neatly within the Charter of the United Nations and that was, accordingly, subordinated to the Security Council\u00a0\u00bb."}